Skip to main content
Tool Automation paid active Below 8
Verified May 2026 Automation Editorial only, no paid placements

Dust

Active

Team AI agent platform for custom assistants that search company data, execute actions, connect tools, and run in Slack, Chrome, Zendesk, and APIs.

Best plan Pro 29 EUR/user/month; Enterprise custom Paid product
Best for Teams building internal AI assistants Automation
Watch Solo users wanting a general chatbot Check fit before switching
Pricing Pro 29 EUR/user/month; Enterprise custom
Launched 2023
Watchlist Dust

Save this page locally, then revisit it when pricing, score notes, or related news changes.

Decision badges Readiness signals
Active productPaidNo public repo listedVerified this monthMonthly review cycleNiche or situational score
Fact ledger Verified fields
Company
Dust
Category
Automation
Pricing model
Paid
Price range
Pro 29 EUR/user/month; Enterprise custom
Status
Active
Last verified
May 5, 2026
Pricing Anchor Dust pricing is plan and seat based across Pro and Enterprise packaging; verify current seats, limits, connectors, and admin/security features before rollout. Dust pricing
Enterprise Controls Security review should cover workspace permissions, data connectors, admin controls, retention, SOC evidence, and model/provider configuration. Dust security
Best For Best for organizations building internal AI agents over company knowledge, apps, and workflows with enterprise controls. Dust official site
Watch Out For Dust creates value when agents are grounded in real company systems; weak connector hygiene or unclear permissions can turn it into another chat UI. Dust docs
Workflow Surface Dust’s surface is custom workplace agents and shared assistant workflows, not a generic consumer chatbot. Dust docs
Change timeline What moved recently
  1. Verified
    Core pricing and product facts checked May 5, 2026 | Monthly cadence
  2. Updated
    Editorial page changed May 5, 2026
Knowledge graph Adjacent context
Company Dust
Category Automation
Best for
  • Teams building internal AI assistants
  • Support, sales, product, and engineering knowledge workflows
  • Companies that want agents over Slack, docs, GitHub, Notion, and Google Drive
  • Teams that need model choice without building a full RAG stack
Not ideal for
  • Solo users wanting a general chatbot
  • Teams needing full enterprise search at Glean scale
  • Highly regulated workflows without security review

Dust is a team AI-agent platform. Users create custom assistants that can search company data sources, use advanced models, execute actions, and integrate into tools such as Slack, Chrome, Zendesk, APIs, Google Sheets, and Zapier.

It sits between no-code automation and enterprise search. Compared with Glean, Dust is more builder-oriented and lighter-weight. Compared with n8n or Zapier, Dust is more AI-agent-native.

System Verdict

Pick Dust if your team wants useful internal AI agents without building a custom RAG platform. It is strongest for knowledge search plus actions across real workplace systems.

Skip it if you only need generic chat. ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini will be cheaper and simpler.

Dust’s value is operational context: connected data, team spaces, native integrations, and action-capable agents.

Key Facts

Core productTeam AI agents and assistants
ModelsAdvanced models from GPT, Claude, Gemini, Mistral and others
Data sourcesGitHub, Google Drive, Notion, Slack and more
IntegrationsSlack, Zendesk, Chrome Extension, API, GSheet, Zapier
SecuritySOC 2, zero data retention positioning, private spaces
PricingPro 29 EUR/user/month; Enterprise custom from larger teams
Pro limitsFair-use messages, programmatic credits, up to 1GB/user data sources, one private space
Best fitInternal agents for teams

When to pick Dust

  • You need company-grounded assistants. Agents can search selected data sources before answering.
  • You need actions, not just answers. Dust agents can execute approved tools.
  • You work in Slack. Native Slack integration makes agents reachable where teams already ask questions.
  • You want model choice. Dust exposes multiple frontier providers rather than betting on one model.
  • You want a builder surface. Non-infra teams can create repeatable agents without owning vector database plumbing.
  • You need programmatic usage. API, Google Sheets, and Zapier credits make Dust useful beyond chat-style assistant surfaces.

When to pick something else

Pricing

Dust publishes a Pro plan at 29 EUR per user per month, excluding tax, with a 14-day trial. As verified on 2026-05-05, Pro starts from one user and includes advanced models, custom action-capable agents, core connections, native integrations, privacy/security features, fair-use unlimited messages, programmatic credits, fixed pricing on additional programmatic usage, up to 1GB per user of data sources, and one private space.

Enterprise is custom and starts from larger teams, with Dust’s pricing page positioning it from 100 members. It adds advanced security and controls, larger storage and file limits, custom programmatic pricing, SSO, flexible payment options, priority support and account management, priority access to new features, US/EU data hosting, SCIM, and Salesforce tooling.

The pricing is reasonable for team workflows if agents replace repeated internal support, research, or support-answering labor. It is expensive if used like a casual chatbot.

Buyer fit

Dust is strongest when a team can name repeatable internal jobs: answer support questions from product docs, summarize account history, draft customer responses, search engineering knowledge, pull context from Slack and GitHub, or run an approved action from a shared assistant.

It is weaker when the organization only wants a general chatbot. The value depends on connective tissue: clean source permissions, useful data sources, well-scoped agents, and teams willing to move repeated questions into shared workflows instead of one-off chats.

Rollout checklist

  • Start with one department and one high-frequency workflow.
  • Connect only the sources needed for that workflow.
  • Define which tools an agent may execute and which actions require human review.
  • Decide who owns assistant prompts, source hygiene, and regression testing.
  • Check whether Pro storage, private space, and programmatic usage limits match the pilot.
  • Move to Enterprise review before broad rollout, SSO, SCIM, hosting requirements, or regulated data.

Failure Modes

  • Agent quality depends on source data. Bad docs produce bad answers.
  • Storage limits matter. Pro includes limited data-source storage per user.
  • Action permissions need care. Tool-executing agents require governance.
  • Not a full workflow engine. Complex deterministic automation may still belong in n8n or Zapier.
  • Enterprise features are custom. SSO, SCIM, hosting, and bigger limits require sales.
  • Fair-use language needs review. “Unlimited” messages still depend on fair-use limits and programmatic usage terms.

Methodology

Last verified 2026-05-05 against Dust pricing, product, and documentation pages. Scoring emphasizes team utility, action-capable agents, integrations, pricing, and enterprise readiness.

FAQ

Can Dust agents search company data? Yes. Dust agents can search selected data sources and use relevant documents to answer.

Does Dust support Slack? Yes. Slack is a native integration.

Is Dust free? Dust offers a trial, but its main self-serve plan is paid per user.

Sources

Share LinkedIn
Was this review helpful?
Embed this score on your site Free. Links back.
Dust editorial score badge
<a href="https://aipedia.wiki/tools/dust/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://aipedia.wiki/badges/dust.svg" alt="Dust on aipedia.wiki" width="260" height="72" /></a>
[![Dust on aipedia.wiki](https://aipedia.wiki/badges/dust.svg)](https://aipedia.wiki/tools/dust/)

Badge value auto-updates if the editorial score changes. Attribution via the link is required.

Cite this page For journalists, researchers, and bloggers
According to aipedia.wiki Editorial at aipedia.wiki (https://aipedia.wiki/tools/dust/)
aipedia.wiki Editorial. (2026). Dust — Editorial Review. aipedia.wiki. Retrieved May 8, 2026, from https://aipedia.wiki/tools/dust/
aipedia.wiki Editorial. "Dust — Editorial Review." aipedia.wiki, 2026, https://aipedia.wiki/tools/dust/. Accessed May 8, 2026.
aipedia.wiki Editorial. 2026. "Dust — Editorial Review." aipedia.wiki. https://aipedia.wiki/tools/dust/.
@misc{dust-editorial-review-2026, author = {{aipedia.wiki Editorial}}, title = {Dust — Editorial Review}, year = {2026}, publisher = {aipedia.wiki}, url = {https://aipedia.wiki/tools/dust/}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-08} }
Spotted an error or want to share your experience with Dust?

Every tool page is re-verified on a recurring cycle, and corrections land faster when readers flag them directly. If you spot a stale fact, a missing capability, or have used Dust and want to share what worked or didn't, the editorial desk reviews every message sent through this form.

Email editorial@aipedia.wiki
Report outdated info Help us keep this page accurate