Presentations.AI vs Tome

Presentations.AI is the active choice over Tome for buyers who want AI-generated presentations with team collaboration, brand themes, templates, analytics, export paths, and enterprise controls. Tome Slides was sunset on April 30, 2025 according to Tome’s official Help Center, and the founding team later pivoted into Lightfield, an AI-native CRM.

The practical buyer answer: use Presentations.AI if you wanted an AI-first presentation generator but need a current product with team and brand controls. Do not shortlist Tome for new presentation work. This comparison was re-verified on May 8, 2026 against current Presentations.AI, Tome, VentureBeat, and Lightfield sources.

Quick Verdict

Winner: Presentations.AI. Presentations.AI remains an active AI presentation product with a current pricing page. As verified on May 8, 2026, its pricing page describes Starter, Public Beta, Pro, and Enterprise paths, including limited or additional AI credits, sharing and publishing, brand themes, team collaboration, pro templates, custom themes, custom fonts/colors, analytics, export to PDF, company templates, admin capabilities, dedicated support, and enterprise-level security.

Tome is not a current buyer option. The older page treated Tome as a live solo/storytelling tool with active pricing and model claims. That is outdated. Tome Slides was sunset, and old Tome presentation data and pricing should be treated as historical.

Why Tome Is Not A Current Choice

Tome’s Help Center says Tome Slides was sunsetting on April 30, 2025. It told users to migrate important work before that date, said users would not be able to sign in or access Tome content afterward, and said all user data, including Tome Slides files, would be deleted after April 30, 2025.

That changes the purpose of this route. It should not pretend Presentations.AI and Tome are two equal current choices. It should answer the real 2026 question: if someone once considered Tome for AI-generated decks, when should they choose Presentations.AI instead?

Where Presentations.AI Wins

Presentations.AI wins for teams that want AI deck generation with brand and collaboration controls. Its current pricing page emphasizes brand themes, team collaboration, seamless sharing, pro templates, custom themes, analytics, PDF export, additional AI credits, custom fonts and colors, company templates, admin capabilities, dedicated support, and enterprise security. That is a better fit for teams than chasing a discontinued product with no current presentation roadmap.

Presentations.AI is especially strong if you want:

• AI-generated presentations with current signups and pricing.
• Brand themes, custom fonts/colors, and pro templates.
• Team collaboration and publishing/sharing.
• Analytics and PDF export.
• Enterprise controls such as company templates, admin capabilities, support, and security.

Where Tome Used To Win

Tome used to win on story-first creation. It felt lightweight and creative, especially for founders and solo users who wanted to communicate an idea quickly. That history explains why people still search for Tome alternatives.

But Presentations.AI is stronger for a current team procurement decision. It is active, has live pricing, and exposes team and enterprise features. Tome’s former creative appeal does not overcome the shutdown.

Pricing Reality

Presentations.AI has current pricing, though its pricing page uses early-bird/public-beta language that buyers should verify before purchase. On May 8, 2026, the pricing page showed a Starter path with $0 early-bird pricing, a Public Beta yearly plan for up to 10 members, Pro yearly pricing for one user, and Enterprise contact-us pricing for large teams. It also listed AI credits, brand themes, collaboration, pro templates, analytics, PDF export, support, security, company templates, and admin capabilities.

Tome Slides has no current presentation pricing. Do not rely on old Tome Free/Pro/Enterprise tiers for current buying decisions.

Buyer Recommendations

Choose Presentations.AI if:

• You need an active AI presentation generator with team collaboration.
• Your team cares about brand themes, templates, fonts, colors, and publishing.
• You need analytics, PDF export, or additional AI credits.
• You are evaluating an enterprise or team-oriented presentation workflow.
• You want a tool with current pricing and support instead of a discontinued brand.

Do not choose Tome if:

• You are creating new AI presentations in 2026.
• You need account access, data continuity, billing, or vendor support.
• You found old reviews describing Tome as a live presentation tool.
• You need a team or enterprise workflow that can survive procurement review.

What To Avoid

• Do not compare Tome pricing as if it is live. The old page’s Tome prices are historical and unsafe for procurement.
• Do not make model/context-window claims without official sources. Those stale claims have been removed.
• Do not assume Presentations.AI is the closest creative replacement. Gamma may be closer to Tome’s old narrative feel; Presentations.AI is more useful for branded AI deck workflows.
• Do not ignore public-beta language. Check Presentations.AI live pricing before committing to a team rollout.

Bottom Line

Presentations.AI is the active option for buyers who want AI-generated presentations with brand themes, collaboration, analytics, PDF export, and team or enterprise controls. Tome is a discontinued presentation product and should not be used for new work.

If your old Tome workflow was solo narrative creation, compare Gamma. If your workflow is branded AI deck production for a team, start with Presentations.AI.